H12-831_V1.0 Practice Exam Questions and Answers

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

To analyze the correct answer, we need to break down the topology and protocol behaviors step by step:

Understanding the IS-IS and OSPFv3 Network Setup:

IS-IS IPv6 is running between R2, R6, and R3.

OSPFv3 is running on other links.

Area 1 is a stub area, which means it does not accept external routes but can have a default route (::/0).

Area 2 is an NSSA (Not-So-Stubby Area), meaning it allows external routes as NSSA external LSAs.

Analysis of Each Answer Option:

A.  

R6 only participates in IS-IS (Level-1) and does not receive a default route (::/0) from Level-2 routers.

Since R6 is in IS-IS Level-1 and does not have a connection to a Level-2 router that provides a default route, it will not have a ::/0 route in its routing table.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Understanding the IS-IS Network and IPv6 Route Summary Behavior

IS-IS Areas and Router Roles:

Area 49.0001 (Level-1-2): R1, R2, R4

Area 49.0002 (Level-1-2 & Level-1): R3 (Level-1-2), R5 (Level-1 only)

Effect of ipv6 summary 2000::/64 level-2 Command

This command on R1 and R2 summarizes the 2000::/64 prefix for Level-2 routers.

Instead of advertising the detailed 2000::4/128 prefix, R1 and R2 advertise only the summarized 2000::/64 route to other Level-2 routers.

Effect of ipv6 import-route isis level-2 into level-1 Command

This command allows Level-1 routers (like R3) to learn Level-2 routes (like 2000::/64).

R1 and R2 redistribute the 2000::/64 summary route into Level-1 IS-IS areas, making it available to Level-1 routers.

Route Distribution Analysis for Each Router

R4 (Does Not Have 2000::/64) ❌

R4 only advertises its Loopback0 (2000::4/128).

It does not need to install the summarized 2000::/64 route, as it originates from its own loopback.

✅ R4 does NOT have the 2000::/64 route.

R5 (Does Not Have 2000::/64) ❌

R5 is a Level-1-only router in Area 49.0002.

It does not have a Level-2 connection to learn the summarized 2000::/64 route.

Because R5 is Level-1 only, it can only receive routes if a default route is provided, which is not mentioned in the question.

✅ R5 does NOT have the 2000::/64 route.

R3 (Has 2000::/64) ✅

R3 is a Level-1-2 router, meaning it can learn both Level-1 and Level-2 routes.

Since R1 and R2 advertise the summarized 2000::/64 route into Level-2 and R3 has ipv6 import-route isis level-2 into level-1, R3 will install 2000::/64 in its routing table.

✅ R3 has the 2000::/64 route.

R2 (Has 2000::/64) ✅

R2 is a Level-1-2 router and has the ipv6 summary 2000::/64 level-2 command enabled.

This means R2 advertises the summarized 2000::/64 route to other Level-2 routers and installs it in its own routing table.

✅ R2 has the 2000::/64 route.

Final Conclusion:

✅ R3 has the route 2000::/64.✅ R2 has the route 2000::/64.❌ R4 does NOT have the route 2000::/64.❌ R5 does NOT have the route 2000::/64.

Thus, the correct answers are:

C.  

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Understanding the network connectivity:

R1 and R2 are connected through 10.0.12.0/24 and running OSPF in Area 0.

PC1 (192.168.1.11/24) is connected to R1, and PC2 (192.168.1.12/24) is connected to R2.

Analyzing each option:

Option A: "R2 cannot ping 10.0.12.1." ❌ Incorrect

R2 is directly connected to 10.0.12.1/24 (R1) on GE0/0/0, so it can ping this IP without any routing issues.

Option B: "PC1 and PC2 cannot ping each other." ✅ Correct

OSPF is only running between R1 and R2. There is no indication that R1 and R2 are redistributing connected routes (192.168.1.0/24 and 192.168.1.0/24) into OSP

F.  

As a result, R1 does not know how to reach 192.168.1.12, and R2 does not know how to reach 192.168.1.11, making communication between PC1 and PC2 impossible.

Option C: "R1 cannot ping 192.168.1.2." ❌ Incorrect

192.168.1.2 is directly connected to R2, and if R1 can reach R2 through OSPF, then R1 should be able to ping 192.168.1.2.

Option D: "R1 cannot ping 192.168.1.12." ✅ Correct

192.168.1.12 is connected to R2, but if R2 does not advertise this network to R1, R1 has no route to reach it.

Since PC1 (192.168.1.11) and PC2 (192.168.1.12) are on different subnets, and there's no redistribution, R1 cannot reach PC2's IP.

Key Takeaways and Fix Recommendations:

To allow PC1 and PC2 to communicate, R1 and R2 must advertise their directly connected networks (192.168.1.0/24) in OSPF using the network command or by redistributing connected routes into OSP

F.  

Command example:

makefile

CopyEdit

R1:

router ospf 1

network 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0

R2:

router ospf 1

network 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0

This would allow R1 to learn about PC2's network and R2 to learn about PC1's network, enabling communication.

HCIP-Datacom-Advanced Routing & Switching Technology References:

HCIP-Datacom Official Certification Guide, Chapter on OSPF Network Design and Troubleshooting.

Huawei Datacom Training Materials, Section on OSPF Inter-Area and External Route Advertisements.

Huawei Datacom Configuration Guide, Command Reference for OSPF network advertisement and route redistribution.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

1. Understanding DHCP Snooping

DHCP Snooping is a security feature that filters untrusted DHCP messages to prevent attacks such as:

Rogue DHCP servers distributing incorrect IP addresses.

DHCP starvation attacks.

In DHCP Snooping, switch ports are classified as:

Trusted Interfaces: Allow both DHCP requests and DHCP responses to pass through.

Untrusted Interfaces: Allow only DHCP requests but drop DHCP responses (to prevent rogue DHCP servers).

2. Analyzing Each Answer Option

Option A: "When receiving a DHCP response packet on GE0/0/2, the switch forwards the packet through GE0/0/1."

Correct.

GE0/0/2 is a trusted interface (connected to the DHCP server).

DHCP responses (ACK, NAK, OFFER) come from the DHCP Server.

Since DHCP responses are allowed on trusted interfaces, the switch forwards them to the client (PC1) via GE0/0/1.

Option B: "When receiving a DHCP request packet on GE0/0/2, the switch forwards the packet through GE0/0/3."

Incorrect.

DHCP requests originate from clients (PC1, attackers, etc.), not from the DHCP server.

The DHCP request should be forwarded to the DHCP server via a trusted interface (not GE0/0/3, which is untrusted).

Option C: "When receiving a DHCP response packet on GE0/0/3, the switch forwards the packet through GE0/0/1."

Incorrect.

GE0/0/3 is an untrusted interface (connected to the attacker).

DHCP responses (ACK, OFFER) from untrusted interfaces are dropped to prevent rogue DHCP attacks.

The switch will not forward the packet.

Option D: "When receiving a DHCP request packet on GE0/0/3, the switch forwards the packet through GE0/0/2."

Correct.

DHCP requests originate from clients (PC1 or attacker).

Since DHCP requests are allowed on untrusted interfaces, the switch forwards them to the DHCP server via the trusted interface (GE0/0/2).

Final Answer:

✅ A and D are correct.

HCIP-Datacom-Advanced Routing & Switching Technology References:

DHCP Snooping and Port Trust Classification

How Trusted and Untrusted Ports Handle DHCP Packets

Preventing Rogue DHCP Servers Using DHCP Snooping